With respect to litigation before performing rights organizations such as the American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers and Broadcast Music, Inc. in United States v. It is not the same as a consent judgment or a consent decree. Many of the first court cases involving an approval order set precedents for the role judges would play in negotiating, approving, interpreting and amending a settlement between two parties.  T92  The judge`s role with respect to the consent order varies between “stamping” and applying his or her own judgments to a proposed settlement. T92  In 1879, Pacific Railroad of Missouri v. Ketchum limited the court`s role in consent decrees to simply supporting an agreement that the parties had already reached themselves.   With regard to antitrust regulation, swift & Co. against the United States, the first consent order used in antitrust regulation under the Sherman Antitrust Act.   In Swift & Co.c. The U.S.
Supreme Court has ruled that a consent order can only be amended or terminated if new developments over time produce a “grave injustice” in how the judgment of the consent order affects the parties to the lawsuit.    The Supreme Court supported this limited flexibility of consent orders in United States v. Terminal R.R. First, in the absence of a court-appointed oversight team, consent orders may not have a real effect on reducing deaths. Secondly, sending a letter on technical assistance can not only lead to the fact that the number of police-related deaths is not reduced, but also increased. The reason for this is unknown – but one possible explanation is that such letters are perceived by law enforcement as a mere slap, leaving authorities free to stick to the status quo without implementing any of the recommended guidelines. .